A Reply from Caribou

19 Jun 2006

I got a note back from Caribou Coffee:

Dear Mr. Potts,

Thank you for your comments regarding our bakery. At Caribou we strive to offer products and service of excellence and appreciate our guests’ feedback. In regard to our current listings on the website, because of the proprietary nature of several of Caribou’s offerings, we do not post ingredient lists in full detail. If you ever have any question as to particular ingredients an item might contain, due to allergies for example, we will be happy to tell you if the item contains that ingredient. Also, I have passed your suggestions regarding the trans-fat content in our offerings to the Food Team for further consideration in light of their future offerings. Again, thank you for your message and suggestions on how we can improve our bakery case for your enjoyment.

Sincerely,

(name removed)
Customer Relations Specialist
Caribou Coffee Company

OK, at first glance this looks fairly typical, but at least they wrote back. But look a little closer at what they are actually saying: “because of the proprietary nature of several of Caribou’s offerings, we do not post ingredient lists in full detail.”

Think about that for a moment. Every product you buy at the supermarket is required by law to disclose what it is made of, even if sometimes the ingredients are a bit obfuscated (like “natural flavorings.”) But Caribou is telling me that the recipes for its baked goods are proprietary — a trade secret!

I guess they don’t want Starbucks copying their recipes. But it seems like any remotely competent pastry chef could come up with an iced scone with cranberries and organge zest. Just start with the Joy of Cooking and modify a little bit. In fact, I could do it, and I don’t even bake. And my recipe wouldn’t contain trans fats. It would taste better.

But I’m free to ask about any ingredients I’m concerned about: “If you ever have any question as to particular ingredients an item might contain, due to allergies for example, we will be happy to tell you if the item contains that ingredient.”

Hmmm. This seems like the setup for a comedy piece.

Me: “How about ground oak tree bark? It gives me a terrible rash.”
Customer Service Representative: “Ummm… nope, no ground oak tree bark.”
Me: “Is there by chance any Cadmium-117? It gives me wind.”
Customer Service Representative: “Hang on… well, a trace amount, less than 1 part per billion… you’ll hardly taste it.”
Me: “What about powdered dung beetle pincers? They make my eardrums swell.”
Customer Service Representative: “Hmmm… no, not powdered dung beetle pincers…”
Me: “Stag beetles?”
Customer Service Representative: “Warmer…”

Sigh. Proprietary recipes? I think I’ll skip breakfast.

Creative Commons Licence
This work by Paul R. Potts is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The CSS framework is stylize.css, Copyright © 2014 by Jack Crawford.

Year IndexAll Years IndexWriting Archive